Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered. By using this service, some information may be shared with YouTube. Familiarizing yourself with several styles of debate Lincoln-Douglas, Parliamentary, Public Forum, and Policy , will open up more opportunities to judge tournaments.
Helpful 2 Not Helpful 2. If you want to begin participating as a judge, look for debate associations in your area and ask how you can get involved. Helpful 1 Not Helpful 2. Submit a Tip All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published.
Related wikiHows How to. How to. More References 1. About This Article. Co-authored by:. Co-authors: Updated: April 1, Categories: Debates. Italiano: Giudicare un Dibattito. Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read , times. These tips have broadened my understanding and prepared me better. More reader stories Hide reader stories. Did this article help you? Cookies make wikiHow better. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy.
Mulbah Howard May 27, Bangura Mohamed Mar 3, Tuti Handayani Jan 23, Yasin Amir May 3, Pankaj Bhatt Feb 21, Share yours! More success stories Hide success stories. By signing up you are agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy. Follow Us. Are they able to continue to defend their position under tough questioning? Audience questions and team exchanges The audience have a chance to ask questions to either side, or to make brief points, and the two teams have an opportunity to challenge each other directly.
Are the students able to pick out and respond to the most salient points made in the cross examination and audience questions? Are they prepared to be intellectually brave and stick to their side of the argument throughout the debate?
Are they able to put intelligent and relevant questions to the opposing side which really get to the heart of the issue? Do their responses take the debate further, or are they staying in their comfort zone and re-visiting the same ground? Final remarks Students are given one minute each to put across their final remarks stating why they have made the best argument. Do the students use the time provided to its best effect?
Do they put across a good, strong final reason for the judges to support their side of the motion? Have the students progressed since the beginning of the debate? We ask judges to consider: How have the students performed as individuals and as a team?
What were the strengths and weaknesses of their argument use of evidence, intellectual sophistication, persuasiveness and passion. In the morning, there will be student and judge check-in. That is followed by an educational seminar on the debate topic for the day, delivered either by someone from the Coolidge Foundation or by an outside guest. That seminar is intended to give students and judges the opportunity to learn a little more about the topic that will be debated that day, and allow students to ask clarifying questions.
After the morning seminar, the first round match-ups will be posted, which will describe which teams are debating each other, in which location, and with which judge. After each round, the ballots will be collected, the results will be tallied, and then the next round of match-ups will be generated and posted.
A typical tournament will go three to four rounds, after which the winners will be determined based on their record and speaker points. There is always at least a short break in between rounds. As a debate judge, your main role and responsibility is to listen to each side make its case and then do three things: 1 render a decision about which team won the debate, 2 award individual speaker points, and 3 return your ballot promptly or allow it to be collected by a staffer or volunteer.
At the Coolidge Foundation, we believe in the power of citizen judges to be able to follow a debate and render a reasonable decision. Taking notes while listening is appropriate and encouraged.
The most important things when judging a debate are to adopt a neutral stance about the resolution, and to do your best to be fair, encouraging, and supportive to your debaters. They are here to learn from you, no matter what your experience level is.
Some arguments are so dreadfully weak that they will do more damage than good. Connection to the case. Sometimes, you see arguments coming up that are only loosely connected to the case or way beyond the point. The most important argument should be mentioned first. If you start with a minor point or an argument that goes beside the point, the other side will probably not have enough arguments to deal with in their rebuttal.
You must rebut all the arguments on the other side, as weak as they may be. If an argument is terribly weak but the other team does not clash it, it remains standing and will contribute to your defeat. Before you enter a prepared debate, you may do a lot of research. The other team may do the same. But it is rather unlikely your opponent will know all the tiny little details associated with the case. Generally speaking, it is very hard to attack someone on grounds of factual correctness.
As long as it sounds plausible, people will accept your materials. Not even the judges know the exact background of the motion and there is no way of checking during a debate. Examples : Does a debater come up with a few rather convincing examples? But everyone can google a few examples that work in a debate. They should be relevant, though. Balance between rebuttal and clash : Especially second speakers may feel tempted to overdo their rebuttals and neglect their own substantive arguments. Even a third speaker cannot solely rely on rebutting but must show why the motion matters to the overall case.
Range of marks: As for strategy, marks never go below 12 or higher than 16 points per substantive speech. Feel free to use 0. In reply speeches the margin is Timing : Timing is important. Speaking time is 6 minutes Senior League: 8 min.
0コメント