The Dothraki would have likely pillaged the Crownlands, forcing either Stannis, Renly, Robb or Joffrey to ally against them. The Dothraki do not know Westerosi politics and it is unlikely that Drogo would have been successful in winning the Iron Throne for his son.
His presence would have likely forced the warring lords of Westeros to work together. If Drogo had lived to successfully invade the Seven Kingdoms then it is likely she would have thrown a leech into the fire for him too.
Without Drogo, Daenerys has no hope of seizing the throne. The Dothraki would disband and fight amongst themselves, wreaking havoc in Westeros. This scenario is shaky, but Daenerys would quickly realize upon invading Westeros that she needs to make allies. The lords of Westeros would look down upon the Dothraki due to their foreign culture and, alone, the khalasar has no hope of holding the Iron Throne.
If Dany promises Northern independence for Robb on the condition that the Starks help her win the throne for her son then an alliance between House Stark and House Targaryen could happen much sooner.
Both have common enemies with the Lannisters and the added numbers of Drogo's khalasar could have made a big difference for Robb's plight. With Jon Snow spending most of the series either at the Wall or beyond it, then it is likely that he and Daenerys would never meet in a timeline where Drogo survives.
The incestuous romantic relationship would never have happened and Jon would not have killed the Dragon Queen. Drogo's presence at Dany's side offers a disadvantage in that she cannot make alliances with a marriage pact. It is possible she could promise her son and heir Rhaego to a Westerosi lady, though it would be years before the Targaryen prince would be old enough to marry.
Even if Khal Drogo had lived to see another season, his invasion of Westeros would likely be unsuccessful. I do not imagine that Drogo would have been cool with their flirtatious and eventually sexual relationship, which seems to been the main reason for Daario's loyalty to her. While her motivations are occasionally dubious, many of Dany's gestures are built on her moral commitments to human life and freedom. While Drogo and Dany had a briefly cute relationship, I don't imagine him being as anti-slavery as she was.
This would have been, at the very least, a source of marital strife. I think that even one happy couple that lasted for more than a season might have changed the tone of the series to something a little more sentimental. On the other hand, I wonder if Drogo and Dany's love would have been able to survive their seemingly different opinions of raw meat and murder.
Would Dany's fate have been better if the love of her life had remained alive? I'm not so sure. From what I've seen, she only really needs three powerful allies — and unlike Drogo, they all breath fire.
Images: HBO; Giphy 6. By Loretta Donelan. As I see it, only the physical body of the warrior perished in Season 1. His soul and spirit never left, and he continues to prove that with each and every episode.
Continue reading at your own risk So my theory goes like this: When Khal Drogo's body was burned it allowed the dragons to be born, and his soul was actually carried over into one of the trio of beasts. The "main" dragon of the series is named Drogon, literally a mix of the words Drogo and dragon. It's also worth noting that Drogon is far and away the biggest of the dragons, with darker scales than the other two and red tones throughout its body, mimicking the look of Khal Drogo.
The more you think about it though, the two have much more in common than just their name and appearance. It's been made very clear that Drogon and Daenerys have a special relationship, much different than the one she has with the other two dragons. Drogon has always acted as her protector, often getting in the way of danger in order to save his queen or taking her away to safety when necessary. Drogo made a similar promise to his bride years ago.
0コメント